Legal Opinion

Chanhassen Chiropractic Center, P.A. v. City of Chanhassen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 2003No. C0-02-1724PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Respondent’s city manager denied appellant’s claim for relocation benefits and advised it of the right to an appeal to the Chanhassen City Council. Appellant sought mandamus relief from the district court, arguing that the city failed to appoint an impartial hearing officer to hear the appeal. Because the district court properly concluded that the city had not violated a clear duty in the relocation assistance hearing process, we affirm the court’s denial of the writ of mandamus.

FACTS

Petitioner Chanhassen Chiropractic Center (center) entered into a lease for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. The Board of Commr's of Knox County v. AspinwallSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  3. Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Coyle v. City of DelanoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jensen Field Relocation Claims Jensen Field, Inc. v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Douglas v. Stillwater Area Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Instant Testing Co. v. Community Security BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Shane Feldhaus v. City of MinnetonkaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API