Gale v. Bradbury
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a money judgment, in favor of plaintiff, in the sum of five hundred and twenty-three dollars and eighty-two cents, with interest, etc. The only point made by appellant for a reversal of the judgment is, that the findings are insufficient, because they merely find generally “ that each and all of the allegations of the plaintiff’s complaint are true and are sustained by the evidence”; and “that none of the denials contained in defendant’s answer herein is true or is sustained by the evidence.” The answer contained only denials.
Such findings have been…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- County of San Diego v. SeifertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by12 opinions
- LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Utah National Bank of Salt Lake City v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Heinrich v. HeinrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- McKelvey v. WagyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Kalmus v. Cedars of Lebanon HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.