County of San Diego v. Seifert
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This action is to recover from the defendant, Seifert, the sum of $120, the amount of a li*596cense tax imposed upon his business as a saloon-keeper for a period of twelve months, under an ordinance of the board of supervisors.
The cause was tried by the court, and findings and judgment passed in favor of plaintiff, and the defendant appeals from the judgment, and an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Appellant contends that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, in that,— 1. Facts are not alleged showing the existence of the ordinance; and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by13 opinions
- Estate of SchererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Vance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Kirkland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- City of Grafton v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Gale v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.