Legal Opinion

LaMar v. LaMar

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1947No. L. A. No. 19845PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for divorce against her husband on the grounds of adultery and extreme cruelty. The cause of action on the ground of extreme cruelty was stated in general terms as follows: “Willfully disregarding the solemnity of his marriage vows, defendant has treated *900plaintiff in a cruel manner and has subjected her to a course of cruel treatment and has thereby wrongfully inflicted upon plaintiff grievous mental suffering, humiliation and embarrassment. That because of such cruel treatment, plaintiff has suffered extreme mental cruelty to such an extent as to impair her…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. MacDonald v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Ungemach v. UngemachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Woods v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Phelps v. Woodward Con. Co., N. Util.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1949

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API