Legal Opinion

Heinrich v. Heinrich

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1905No. Civ. No. 94PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County. J. E. Prewett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.

This is an action to enforce a trust. The pleadings and findings are so voluminous that it is impossible to insert more than a brief statement of the vital facts in this opinion. The parties to the action were married in Iowa, November 28, 1902. The defendant represented that he owned a farm in California worth $21,000, and through such representations and expressions of affection for plaintiff he induced her to marry him and come to California to live on his farm. They reached Santa Rosa early in December, 1902. Shortly after their arrival she discovered that his father owned the land, which…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Odell v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Dow v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Shaw v. BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Meagher v. HarringtonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Nimey v. NimeyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Monica v. PelicasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API