Legal Opinion
Gray v. Metts
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 20, 2002No. Civ.A. DKC 2001-2653PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for resolution in this action for attorneys’ fees and costs arising from an Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”) administrative due process hearing are 1) the motion of Defendants to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claim pursuant to FedR.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) as barred by the statute of limitations and 2) the motion of Plaintiffs for summary judgment. The issues have been fully briefed and no hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For reasons that follow, both motions will be denied.
I. Background
The relevant facts as…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Maria Jimena Ibarra v. United States of America Unknown Government OfficersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Interphase Garment Solutions, LLC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Grant v. Shapiro & Burson, LLPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Butler v. VisionAIR, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Sewell v. Strayer UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Taylor v. Giant Food, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.