Legal Opinion
Sewell v. Strayer University
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 9, 2013No. Civil Action No. DKC 12-2927PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending, and ready for resolution in this employment discrimination case are several motions: the motion for recusal filed by pro se Plaintiff Starsha Monet Sewell (ECF No. 23); the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Strayer University, Inc. (“Strayer”)1 (ECF No. 7); and the motion for summary judgment filed by Ms. Sewell (ECF No. 16). The court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6, no hearing being deemed.necessary. For the reasons that follow, Ms. Sewell’s motion for recusal will be denied, Strayer’s motion to dismiss will…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Alvarez-Soto v. B. Frank Joy, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Mercer v. PHH Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Abram v. Aerotek Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Falling v. Mayor and City Council Of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Hodge v. Walrus Oyster Ale HouseDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.