Legal Opinion
Carusillo v. Associated Women's Health Specialists, P.C.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 23, 2003No. AC 21604PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
This case is before us on remand from our Supreme Court. Carusillo v. Associated Women’s Health Specialists, P.C., 262 Conn. 920, 812 A.2d 861 (2002). The plaintiff Allison Carusillo1 appealed to this court from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Associated Women’s Health Specialists, P.C., after the granting of the defendant’s motion to set aside the jury’s verdict and damages award. We determined that the court improperly granted the defendant’s motion because expert testimony may be based on inadmissible hearsay as long as the expert’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Maloney v. PCRE, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Marchell v. WhelchelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Harlan v. Norwalk Anesthesiology, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Carusillo v. Associated Women's Health Specialists, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- Menon v. DuxConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Message Center Management, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Maag v. Homechek Real Estate Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Dallaire v. HsuConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Caprood v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.