Caprood v. Atlanta Casualty Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
This case concerns the quantum of proof that an injured insured person must present to a jury to recover damages under an automobile insurance policy covering hit and run drivers. A jury found that the injured insured had proven that her injuries resulted from the negligence of a hit-and-run driver. The trial court, however, granted the motion of the insurer to set aside the verdict in favor of the injured person and rendered judgment in favor of the insurer. The injured person has appealed. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff, Hope M. Caprood, filed a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. MalaveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Chasse v. AlbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elliott v. LarsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Message Center Management, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Com. v. Clay, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019