Legal Opinion
Marchell v. Whelchel
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 30, 2001No. AC 20604PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Andrew H. Marchell,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered following a jury trial, in favor of the defendant, Lynn W. Whelchel, Jr., in this medical malpractice action. The plaintiff claims on appeal that the court improperly (1) denied his motion to set aside the verdict, (2) admitted into evidence irrelevant and prejudicial testimony of the defendant’s medical expert, (3) limited his closing argument, (4) refused to allow him to amend his complaint and (5) instructed the jury. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shelnitz v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Hally v. Hospital of St. RaphaelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Elm Street Builders, Inc. v. Enterprise Park Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Opotzner v. BassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. BillieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Grondin v. CuriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Raybeck v. Danbury Orthopedic Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Harlan v. Norwalk Anesthesiology, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Bonan v. Goldring Home Inspections, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Message Center Management, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.