Legal Opinion
Carusillo v. Associated Women's Health Specialists, P.C.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 3, 2002No. AC 21604PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
In this medical malpractice action, the plaintiff Allison Carusillo2 appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Associated Women’s Health Specialists, P.C., following the granting of the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. The court granted the motion on the ground that the jury had returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on the basis of inadmissible hearsay. On appeal, the plaintiff raises several arguments in support of her central claim that the evidence presented at trial did not constitute…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aspiazu v. OrgeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- George v. EricsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Hammer v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- In re Barbara J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Poulin v. YasnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carusillo v. Associated Women's Health Specialists, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Tadros v. TripodiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Phelps v. LankesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- DiNapoli v. RegensteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- National Publishing v. Hartford Fire, No. Cv 97 0156478 S (Oct. 7, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.