Legal Opinion
Novozymes A/S v. Genencor International, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 16, 2007No. CIV A 05-160-KAJPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POST-TRIAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
JORDAN, Circuit Judge. 1
I. INTRODUCTION
Novozymes A/S (“Novozymes”) has sued Genencor International, Inc. (“Genencor”) and Enzyme Development Corporation (“EDC”) (collectively “Defendants”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,867,031 (issued Mar. 15, 2005) (the “ ’031 patent”). Briefly, the technology at issue relates to alpha-amylase enzymes that are used in the production of fuel ethanol. Trial of this matter was bifurcated. The first bench trial focused on patent infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability. In my post-trial…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Wms Gaming Inc. v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- TruePosition Inc. v. ANDREW CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Praxair, Inc. v. Atmi, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- Milwaukee Elec. Tool Corp. v. Snap-On Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.