Legal Opinion
The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg Division
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 23, 1992No. 91-1069PublishedCited by 435 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Chief Judge.
Portee, Inc., appeals from the May 25, 1990, final judgment, entered upon a jury verdict, of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 88-29-JRR, holding Portee liable for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,197,194 (the ’194 patent) and U.S. Design Patent No. 263,836 (the ’836 patent), and awarding The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. (collectively Read) treble damages and attorney fees. The district court’s opinion denying Portee’s motion for JNOV is reported at Read Corp. v. Portee, Inc., 748 F.Supp. 1078 (D.Del.1990). The…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by435 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
430 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.