Legal Opinion
Praxair, Inc. v. Atmi, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 27, 2007No. Civ. 03-1158-SLRPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Praxair, Inc. and Praxair Technology, Inc. (collectively called “Praxair”) filed the current lawsuit against ATMI, Inc. and Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. (collectively called “ATMI”) on December 22, 2003, alleging infringement of Praxair’s U.S. Patent Nos. 6,007,609 (“the '609 patent”), 6,045,115 (“the '115 patent”), and 5,937,895. (D.I. 1) The case was tried to a jury 1 for six days and, on December 7, 2005, the jury returned a verdict finding all the asserted claims were infringed by ATMI and the patents were not invalid.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Mercexchange, L.L.C. v. Ebay, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- TiVo Inc. v. Echostar Communications Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
- Novozymes A/S v. Genencor International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- Eaton Corp. v. Parker-Hannifin Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003
3Cited by14 opinions
- Praxair, Inc. v. Atmi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- MercExchange, L.L.C. v. eBay, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- TruePosition Inc. v. ANDREW CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Belden Technologies Inc. v. Superior Essex Communications LPDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.