Legal Opinion

Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 26, 2008No. Civ. 98-80-SLR, 98-314-SLR, 98-316-SLRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The history of the present litigation has been well-documented in the court’s prior opinions, and is repeated here by way of summary. Throughout the course of the last ten years, the major manufacturers of stents have filed suit in this court asserting claims of infringement of their respective patents against their competitors. The present lawsuit originally was filed by the predecessor in interest to Medtronic Vascular Inc. and Medtronic USA, Inc. (collectively, “Medtronic”), claiming infringement by Advanced Cardiovascular…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
  3. Datascope Corporation v. Kontron IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. TiVo Inc. v. Echostar Communications Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
  5. TruePosition Inc. v. ANDREW CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Edwards Lifesciences Ag. v. Corevalve, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  2. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  3. Belden Technologies Inc. v. Superior Essex Communications LPDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  4. Telcordia Technologies, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  5. Presidio Components Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API