Legal Opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 28, 1970No. Civ. A. 99-195PublishedCited by 499 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
By opinion dated October 26, 1956, entered in an action by Georgia-Pacific Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “GP”) for a declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-infringement of three patents held by United States Plywood Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “USP”) and upon a counterclaim by USP for patent infringement and unfair competition, my late brother Judge Herlands found USP’s three patents (one Deskey and two Bailey patents) invalid for lack of invention, not infringed by GP’s product and further, that there was no proof that GP engaged in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United States Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- United States Frumentum Co. v. LauhoffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by499 opinions
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Micro Chemical, Inc. v. Lextron, Inc. And Turnkey Computer Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
494 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.