Legal Opinion

State v. LoSacco

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 25, 1987No. 4907PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.

After a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of criminal trespass in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-107.1 The defendant, who represented himself at trial, has appealed pro se claiming that the trial court erred (1) in submitting the matter to the jury when the evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, (2) in charging the jury improperly, as well as in refusing to charge as requested, and (3) in submitting the matter to the jury when public policy and the habits of the country imply a license or privilege to enter a building lobby.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. State v. ScielzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. State v. SiminoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. LittleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lo Sacco v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  2. State v. KinchenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. State v. DelgadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. State v. DyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. Baldwin v. CurtisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API