Legal Opinion
Lo Sacco v. Young
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 19, 1989No. 5736PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s
denial of his motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. The plaintiff claims that the trial court erred (1) in depriving him of a fair trial, (2) in permitting the defendants to cross-examine him with respect to two prior misdemeanor convictions, (3) in refusing to permit him to amend his complaint during the trial, (4) in failing to instruct the jury as requested, and (5) in other evidentiary rulings regarding damages. We find no error.1
*8On November 5, 1985, the plaintiff instituted the present action for malicious prosecution against the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- McHale v. W.B.S. Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Weyant v. OkstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Weyant v. OkstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Russo v. City Of BridgeportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Russo v. City of BridgeportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.