Legal Opinion
SAFECO CORPORATION v. Kuhlman
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 14, 1987No. 7590-7-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
Roger and Barbara Kuhlman appeal a summary judgment in favor of Safeco Corporation denying the Kuhlmans' request to stack their uninsured motorist coverage. The dispositive issue is whether the Safeco policy complied with RCW 48.22.030(5) so as to prevent stacking of uninsured motorist coverage.
The facts are undisputed. On July 3, 1982, Roger and Barbara Kuhlman were involved in an automobile accident on Highway 97 with Kevin Gorman, an uninsured motorist. The Kuhlmans had an automobile liability policy issued by Safeco covering two cars, each with $100,000 uninsured motorist coverage. Safeco…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Federated American Insurance v. RaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McGreevy v. Oregon Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Greengo v. Public Employees Mut. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Greengo v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insuarnce v. LindseyArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- McGreevy v. OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.