McGreevy v. Oregon Mutual Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
— We are called upon to decide but one issue in this appeal: should we overrule our decision in Olympic S.S. Co. v. Centennial Ins. Co., 117 Wn.2d 37, 811 P.2d 673 (1991)? We decline Oregon Mutual Insurance Company’s invitation to do so, concluding, upon reexamination of our decision in that case, that the rationale underlying the decision is firmly grounded on recognized grounds of equity. We, therefore, affirm the court of appeals, and reaffirm the central holding of Olympic Steamship, which was succinctly stated as follows:
"An insured who is compelled to assume the burden of legal action…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Hayseeds, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.