Bethlahmy v. Customcraft Industries, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McMURRAY, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal taken from the denial of appellant’s motion for relief from a default judgment entered against him. The default was entered upon suit for enforcement of his written guarantee of defendant Customeraft’s obligations. Appellant’s attorney withdrew prior to trial and the appellant has since represented himself.
Appellant moved to vacate and set aside the default judgment. He correctly contends that Code of Civil Procedure, section 594, provides that a default judgment may be entered only when the court is satisfied “. . . that the adverse party has had five…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Willson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Transit Ads, Inc. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Lint v. ChisholmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Skolsky v. Electronovision Prods. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Lint v. ChisholmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.