Legal Opinion

Lint v. Chisholm

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1981No. Civ. 22764PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

C. Chisholm appeals an order denying his motion to vacate a default judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 4731). He asserts multiple grounds: surprise, excusable neglect, absent his stipulation the temporary judge lacked authority to enter the default judgment, variance between the judgment and minute order, variance between the relief granted and that prayed for, and error in the court's failure to dispose of his cross-complaint or calculate the factors argued in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Sarracino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hearn v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Reisman v. ShahverdianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Strathvale Holdings v. E.B.H.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. In Re Marriage of FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Bank of West v. Commercial Credit Financial Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API