Legal Opinion

Skolsky v. Electronovision Prods. Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1967No. Civ. 30504PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.

Plaintiff Skolsky brought an action against Eleetronovision Productions, Inc. on March 2, 1965, by which plaintiff sought, among other things, to recover money due him upon an alleged contract. On April 26, 1965, a writ of attachment issued and on April 27 a garnishment was levied upon De Luxe Laboratories, 1 which was holding a negative motion picture film of the photoplay “Harlow.” This negative, owned by Eleetronovision, was in the laboratory so that positive prints could be manufactured for theatrical exhibition.

Prior to the attachment Eleetronovision had entered into an agreement giving…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Johnson v. Hayes Cal Builders, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Takekawa v. HoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Brasher v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Greenamyer v. Board of Lugo Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Camacho v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Transit Ads, Inc. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People ex rel. Reisig v. Broderick BoysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. People v. Hy-Lond Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API