Elms v. Elms
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The question for decision is whether the trial court abused its discretion in vacating a judgment of annulment under section 473, Code of Civil Procedure, where defendant had filed a general denial, had authorized his counsel to stipulate that the case might be tried in defendant’s absence as a default case, was notified of the trial date one week prior thereto and did not attend the trial but by telegrams discharged his attorney and requested the court to grant a continuance and permit him to file a cross-complaint. Respondent makes no appearance on this appeal.
The parties had celebrated a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Brill v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- McGuire v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hughes v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Viles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Baratti v. BarattiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.