Lint v. Chisholm
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
C. Chisholm appeals an order denying his motion to vacate a default judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 473 1 )- He asserts multiple grounds: surprise, excusable neglect, absent his stipulation the temporary judge lacked authority to enter the default judgment, variance between the judgment and minute order, variance between the relief granted and that prayed for, and error in the court’s failure to dispose of his cross-complaint or calculate the factors argued in it. Chisholm, a self-represented lawyer, also attacks the denial of his motion for summary judgment.
Background
In August…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Sarracino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.