Legal Opinion
Visconti v. Pepper Partners Ltd. Partnership
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 1, 2003No. AC 23329PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
When there is a sale of real property that may be environmentally contaminated, the Hazardous Waste Transfer Act (Transfer Act), General Statutes § 22a-134 et seq., requires a transferor either to provide to a transferee a negative declaration to indicate that the property poses no environmental threat or to certify to the department of environmental protection that remediation measures will be undertaken. In this case, the contract for the sale of the property provided that the transferee would take the risk of environmental contamination and bear the cost of whatever…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- S.M.S. Textile Mills, Inc. v. Brown, Jacobson, Tillinghast, Lahan & King, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Duplissie v. DevinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Biro v. MatzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Durham Manufacturing Co. v. Merriam Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Federal Insurance Co. v. Speedboat Racing Ltd.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.