Legal Opinion
S.M.S. Textile Mills, Inc. v. Brown, Jacobson, Tillinghast, Lahan & King, P.C.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 7, 1993No. 11655PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment in this legal malpractice action. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment because it failed to recognize the existence of disputed issues of material fact regarding the existence and length of the attorney-client relationship between the plaintiff and each defendant, (2) sustained the objection by the defendant Reid and Riege, P.C., to the plaintiff’s request for leave to amend the complaint, and (3) granted the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Amodio v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Collum v. ChapinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Gagne v. VaccaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Rosick v. Equipment Maintenance & Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Baker v. CordiscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.