Legal Opinion
Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 26, 1988No. 13292PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
In this action for damages and other relief based upon the false representations of the defendants, who had formed a joint venture for the development of a recreational real estate subdivision, Hon. Milton J. Herman, a state trial referee acting as the trial court, rendered judgment for the plaintiffs to recover damages of $28,000 and an attorney’s fee of $10,000 on the count of the complaint alleging a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. (CUPTA). The court did not resolve the two remaining counts alleging fraudulent misrepresentations…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Bartha v. Waterbury House Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Giglio v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Puro v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- S.M.S. Textile Mills, Inc. v. Brown, Jacobson, Tillinghast, Lahan & King, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Blanchette v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.