In Re Disciplinary Action Against Redburn
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This attorney discipline case concerns the appropriate discipline to be imposed on respondent, David T. Redburn, an attor ney licensed to practice law in Minnesota. While Redburn was suspended from the practice of law, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) received complaints from three of Redburn’s clients and from a translator Redburn hired to provide in-court services to another client. These complaints alleged that Redburn failed to provide diligent representation, failed to communicate with clients, failed to notify clients of his suspension,…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against De RyckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GrzybekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by17 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.