Armstrong v. Watrous
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
This is a bastardy action wherein the court found the issues for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed from the judgment rendered thereon.
The court found the following facts: The parties be came acquainted in the summer of 1947. They kept company with each other from then until the latter part of June, 1948, and during that period the plaintiff did not associate with other men. In the early part of 1948 they planned to be married immediately after the plaintiff reached' her eighteenth birthday. From the spring of 1948 they engaged in acts of sexual intercourse, the last occasion being on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SegerbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Goldblatt v. FerrignoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Mosher v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- City of Norwalk v. TrombettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Neville v. YaknunasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Palomba v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Clark v. HaggardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- State v. CoulombeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Corvo v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Terrasi v. AndrewsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.