Legal Opinion
Goldblatt v. Ferrigno
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 19, 1951PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jennings. J.
The plaintiffs sought damages claimed to have resulted from the breach of building contracts by the defendant. The defendant filed a counterclaim. Judgment was for the defendant on the complaint and for the plaintiffs on the counterclaim. Both parties appealed, but the defendant did not pursue his appeal.
No evidence was certified. The plaintiffs seek many corrections in the finding. A principal question arises because of their claim that both the memorandum of decision and the exhibits in evidence can be used to correct the finding. The increasing frequency with which claims of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hooker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- O'Keefe v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Bridgeport Airport, Inc. v. Title Guaranty & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Alishausky v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Miner v. MinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Vogel v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Pawlinski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. SciortinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Franchey v. HannesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Murphy v. DantowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.