Legal Opinion
Clark v. Haggard
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 9, 1954PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for false representations alleged to have been made by the defendants in connection with the sale of their land to him. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff to recover from the defendants $5977.50 in damages, and the defendants have appealed. The plaintiff has also appealed.
The pertinent facts in the finding, which is not subject to correction, are as follows: In the spring of 1948 the plaintiff was looking for a new home, located in the country and having substantial acreage around it. He consulted Mrs. Leroy B. Fraser, a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sallies v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Board of Water Commissioners v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Scholfield Gear & Pulley Co. v. ScholfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Carangelo v. Nutmeg Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- E. & F. Construction Co. v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- George Lee Mims, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Donald A. Stuart and Martin SchwarzeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Miller v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Woodling v. Garrett Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.