Legal Opinion

Mosher v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 24, 1929PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYeomans, J.

This is an action under our bastardy statute, which from 1702 to 1902 provided: “And if such woman shall continue constant in her accusation, being put to the discovery in the time of her travail, and also examined on the trial of the cause, it shall be prima facie evidence that such accused person is the father of such child.” We interpreted this statute in Booth v. Hart, 43 Conn. 480, 485, in this language: “And the statute went on to provide that if she should continue constant in her accusation, being examined on oath and put to discovery in the time of her travail, the person whom she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hellman v. KarpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  2. Booth v. HartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  3. Robbins v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Palomba v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Streitweiser v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Lavertue v. NimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Armstrong v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API