Legal Opinion

City of Norwalk v. Trombetta

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 5, 1950PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

The plaintiff brought this action under § 2663 of the General Statutes to obtain reimbursement for money paid by it to the state for the partial support of Vincent Trombetta while he was hospitalized in a humane institution. The court found that Vincent, the defendant’s sen, was confined in a state hospital for the mentally ill from November 30, 1938, to December 31, 1947, and that the defendant is financially able to reimburse the plaintiff. It refused to find, however, that the plaintiff had made any payments to the state for Vincent’s support. Judgment was rendered for the defendant and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dexter Yarn Co. v. American Fabrics Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Reiley v. HealeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. Weller v. Fish Transport Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Johnson v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Darrow v. FleischnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Goldblatt v. FerrignoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Velsmid v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Armstrong v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Evergreen Corporation v. BrownConnecticut Superior Court · 1978
  5. Castellani v. CriscuoloConnecticut Superior Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API