Legal Opinion
Morton v. Wagner
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 2007No. H028942PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.
The trial court issued an injunction pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6, prohibiting appellant, Walter L. Wagner, from harassing respondent, Gail Morton. Appellant did not appeal that order. Instead, appellant filed a motion for reconsideration, which the trial court later denied by an order consisting of two parts. In one part, the court denied the motion to reconsider. In the other part of the order, the court designated appellant a vexatious litigant. Appellant now appeals from both portions of the order. While the appeal was pending, this court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wolfe v. StrankmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Bravo v. IsmajCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Rojes v. Riverside General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Golin v. AllenbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Powell v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Shisler v. Sanfer Sports Cars, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- MALATKA v. HelmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Standard Microsystems Corp. v. Winbond Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.