Legal Opinion
Wolfe v. Strankman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 14, 2004No. 02-15720PublishedCited by 319 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Burton Wolfe seeks a declaratory judgment that California’s Vexatious Litigant Statute, Cal.Civ.Proc. Code §§ 391-391.7, is unconstitutional. He also seeks injunctive relief barring enforcement of the statute. The named defendants in this case are the State of California; California’s Judicial Council; California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald M. George, who is Chair of the Judicial Council; Justice Gary E. Strank-man, Presiding Justice of the First Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal; Superior Court Law and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by319 opinions
- Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Wolfe v. StrankmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Lorrin Whisnant, Individually v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- K2 America Corp. v. Roland Oil & Gas, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
314 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.