Legal Opinion

Bravo v. Ismaj

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 2002No. D037034PublishedCited by 49 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HALLER, J.

Victor J. Bravo filed a lawsuit against his dentist, Dr. Israel Ismaj, and his dental insurer, Cigna Dental Health (Cigna), for fraud and other related allegations. After the court granted defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings, defendants successfully moved for an order declaring Bravo a vexatious litigant and requiring that Bravo obtain permission from the presiding judge before filing any new litigation. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 391.7.) Bravo appeals this order, contending: (1) there was no pending litigation when the motion was raised; (2) he was denied his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Calatayud v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kelly v. New West Federal SavingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. In Re BittakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Mediterranean Constr. Co. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Shalant v. GirardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Thompson v. IoaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Forrest v. Department of CorporationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Fink v. ShemtovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Golin v. AllenbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API