Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Imperial Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The interpretation of the policy in suit, as announced in the court below, that plaintiff’s injury is not within its terms, finds support in the following eases: Whitaker v. Ins. Co., 213 N. C., 376, 196 S. E., 328; Headen. v. Ins. Co., 206 N. C., 860, 175 S. E., 282; Gilmore v. Ins. Co., 199 N. C., 632, 155 S. E., 565; Jolley v. Ins. Co., 199 N. C., 269, 154 S. E., 400; R. R. v. Casualty Co., 145 N. C., 114, 58 S. E., 906. The nonsuit would seem to be correct.

But for another reason, the appeal must be dismissed. The Court is without jurisdiction to entertain it. The attempted appeal is in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jolley v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Riggan v. . HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Powell v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Gilmore v. Imperial Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Whitaker v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. National Accident & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Williams v. . TillmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Clark v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API