Gilmore v. Imperial Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeKsoN, J.
Tbe facts set forth in tbe judgment of tbe court below are controlling. Tbe policy contract, in clear language, provides tbat if tbe insured dies of “apoplexy” witbin one year, tbe liability of tbe company is limited to tbe return of tbe premiums, wbicb have been returned to tbe plaintiff, beneficiary, prior to tbe institution of this action. We will not discuss tbe fact tbat tbe plaintiff, beneficiary, has accepted tbe premiums and perhaps is estopped to bring this action, but will decide tbe main question as to tbe binding effect of tbe contract. We can see no reason why tbe contract,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Spruill v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Holbrook v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
3Cited by15 opinions
- Potts v. Life Insurance Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- McCabe v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Davis v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
- Whitaker v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Reinhardt v. Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.