Jolley v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrosdeN, J.
Does the incontestable clause in the policy preclude the insurance company from asserting that the risk producing the death was not covered by the terms thereof ?
Stated baldly, the proposition of law is this: Does the incontestable clause modify, extend or enlarge the coverage clause?
An examination of the provisions of the policy involved in this litigation discloses that the double indemnity clause by express terms does not cover accidental injuries resulting in death occasioned and brought about by (a) participation in military or naval service or any allied branch thereof in time of war;…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- American Trust Co. v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Scarborough v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Head v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- McDowell Motor Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Bernier v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Chavis v. Southern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Walsh v. United Insurance Company of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.