Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1938PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

By the express terms of the policy in suit the double indemnity clause is not to apply in case “death results from bodily injury inflicted . . .. intentionally by another person.” Jolley v. Ins. Co., 199 N. C., 269, 154 S. E., 400; Matson v. Trav. Ins. Co., 74 Am. St. Rep., 368. It is conceded that the trial court was inattentive to this provision in charging the jury on the third issue. Warren v. Ins. Co., 212 N. C., 354. The contention is advanced, however, that, in view of the answers to the first and second issues, the submission of the third issue was unnecessary, and any error committed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jolley v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Clay v. State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Gilmore v. Imperial Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Allsbrook v. . WalstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Warren v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pharr v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Gorham v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Warren v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Slaughter v. STATE CAPITAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API