Legal Opinion

Riggan v. . Harrison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1932PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

We have examined the seven assignments of error appearing on the record and find none of sufficient merit to warrant a new trial.

But for other reasons, the appeal must be dismissed.

1. Rule 19, sec. 1, provides that “the pleadings on which the case is tried, the issues, and the judgment appealed from shall be a part of the transcript in all cases.” The issues upon which the case was tried are not in the record. It is the uniform practice to dismiss the appeal for failure to send up necessary parts of the record proper. Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126; Waters v. Waters, ibid.,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. In Re Will of BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Waters v. . WatersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Honeycutt v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Reaves v. . Mill Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Powell v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. State v. Ravensford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Ericson v. . EricsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API