Legal Opinion

Williams v. . Tillman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal as the order allowing the plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis is unsupported by the necessary affidavit. McIntire v. McIntire, 203 N. C. 631, 166 S. E. 732; Hanna v. Timberlake, 203 N. C. 556, 166 S. E. 733. The requirements of the statute allowing appeals in forma pauperis are mandatory,' not directory, and a failure to comply with the requirements deprives this Court of any appellate jurisdiction. G.S. 1-288; Powell v. Moore, 204 N. C. 654, 169 S. E. 281; Brown v. Kress Co., 207 N. C. 722, 178 S. E. 248; Gilmore v. Ins. Co., 214 N.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. . StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Riggan v. . HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Powell v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Honeycutt v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. McIntire v. . McIntireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Anderson v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Prevatte v. PrevatteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Dobson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API