Clark v. . Clark
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
Tbe motion to dismiss tbe appeal must be allowed. Tbe requirements of tbe statute relating to appeals to Supreme Court from judgment of Superior Court, in a civil action, G. S., 1-288, formerly C. S., 649, without making tbe deposit or giving tbe security required by law for such appeal are mandatory and jurisdictional, and “unless tbe statute is complied with, tbe appeal is not in this Court, and we can take no cognizance of tbe case, except to dismiss it from our docket.” Honeycutt v. Watkins, 151 N. C., 652, 65 S. E., 762. See, also, among others, these cases: Riggan v. Harrison, 203 N.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Riggan v. . HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Powell v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Honeycutt v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Hanna v. . TimberlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Anderson v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Dobson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953