Legal Opinion
Morin v. City Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 1952No. Civ. 14782PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal from the judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate to compel the City Council of the City of San Jose to find valid certain protests against the annexation of contiguous territory and to set aside any determination to the contrary.
On December 5, 1949, the city council by resolution commenced proceedings to annex territory designated as “Bradley Manor No. 3.” The proceedings were initiated under the provisions of Annexation Act of 1913, Government Code, sections 35100-35157. Pursuant to the statute January 23, 1950, at 8 p. m. was fixed as the time…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carstens v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Mulligan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- American Distilling Co. v. City Council of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Saks & Co. v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Directors of Fallbrook Irrigation District v. AbilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Konen v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1964
- Clallam County v. FolkWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Foth v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- In Re Foreclosure of LiensWashington Supreme Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.