Mulligan v. Smith
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial in the Superior Court of San Francisco. Sullivan, J.
1Opinion of the Court
McKee, J.:
Ejectment to recover possession of certain premises described ■in the complaint as that portion of fifty-vara lot number 3, *220in block number 559, of the Western Addition of the City and County of San Francisco.
The right of recovery, claimed by plaintiff, depends wholly upon a tax deed which had been executed and delivered to him in consummation of a sale of the premises, for the nonpayment of an assessment, which had been levied upon the land, for the purpose of raising a fund for the payment of interest, due and to become due, upon one thousand five hundred and seventy-five bonds,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weimer v. BunburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- In Matter of City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Damp v. Town of DaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Smith v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Potter v. AmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by49 opinions
- Morse v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- County of San Diego v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Crall v. Board of Directors of Poso Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Wilcox v. EngebretsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Warren v. BorawskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.