Legal Opinion

Saks & Co. v. City of Beverly Hills

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 1951No. Civ. 18037, 18038PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This is an appeal by defendant (City of Beverly Hills) from two judgments in favor of plaintiff. The first action filed contains two counts, one for an injunction and one for declaratory relief.

The first count seeks to restrain the enforcement of the revocation of certain temporary variances in zoning ordinances, and the second count seeks a declaration respecting plaintiff’s rights thereto. The second action, in certiorari and mandamus, is to review certain revocation orders of the zoning variances theretofore granted to plaintiff which had been adopted by defendants. The cases were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Heath v. M. C.C. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  3. Dwyer v. City Council of the City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  5. Dierssen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. City of Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Thompson v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Moskow v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. City Council v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API