County of Los Angeles v. City Council
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a peremptory writ of mandate, denying a writ of review and discharging a temporary stay order, and for costs in favor of respondent. The judgment was rendered upon the conclusion reached by the trial court that quo warranto was the sole remedy available to appellant county to test the validity of the annexation proceeding.
The controversy rests in the following background: Appellant, County of Los Angeles, was the owner of a parcel of land within its boundaries known as Alondra Park, which had been designated by the board of supervisors as a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- American Distilling Co. v. City Council of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Kleiber v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Oakland v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Anaheim v. City of FullertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ferrini v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Town of Burnsville v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Trimont Land Co. v. Truckee Sanitary DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Norlund v. ThorpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- City of Colton v. City of RialtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.