Carstens v. Pillsbury
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an original proceeding in review against the Industrial Accident Commission, under section 84 of the Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act. As these proceedings are becoming of frequent occurrence, it is proper to say to those initiating them that the members of the commission, individually, are not proper parties defendant in such proceedings. The commission, by its name, “Industrial Accident Commission,” as given in section 3 of the act, is the proper defendant. The members cannot be made personally responsible for the acts of the commission in the proceedings, at least,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by65 opinions
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- La Prade v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- English v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.