Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Konen v. City of Butte

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1964No. 10644PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles

This is an appeal by the City of Butte from a judgment of the district court issuing a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the City to find that a majority of the resident freeholders had protested the annexation proceeding and to cease and desist from enforcing the resolution of annexation and to cease and desist from exercising any jurisdiction over the annexed area.

The protestants who filed this action through the relators are respondents and will be referred to as protestants. The City of Butte and its officials, respondents below and appellants here, will be called collectively the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Distilling Co. v. City Council of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Sharkey v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People Ex Rel. Mosk v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Berkeley Unified School District v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Kunesh v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Department of Fish, Wildlife & ParksMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Gallatin County v. D & R Music & Vending, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. O'Donnell Fire Service & Equipment Co. v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Allen v. Madison County CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Gallatin County v. D & R Music & Vending, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API